Player Stats

Shedrick Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
874
Receptions
66
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonAuburn2215041
2019 Regular SeasonAuburn2231039.3
2020 PostseasonAuburn4332041.6
2020 Regular SeasonAuburn4352041.6
2021 PostseasonAuburn13213068
2021 Regular SeasonAuburn1338514168
2022 Regular SeasonAuburn816217055.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Auburn paired 527 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Auburn

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

27.1

Efficiency

76.9

Usage

16.1

Consistency

50.2

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mercer: 47. San José State: 17. Penn State: 76. Missouri: 1. Georgia: 0. Arkansas: 29. Western Kentucky: 21. Alabama: 26

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mercer: 4 by 78.3. San José State: 1 by 100. Penn State: 4 by 100. Missouri: 1 by 6.7. Arkansas: 2 by 96.7. Western Kentucky: 2 by 70. Alabama: 2 by 86.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins21.5 · Games = 4 · -11.3 vs Losses
Losses32.8 · Games = 4 · +11.3 vs Wins