Player Stats

Erik Brooks College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,474
Receptions
124
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonFresno State117042.2
2020 Regular SeasonFresno State511128046.1
2021 Regular SeasonFresno State817184244.4
2022 PostseasonFresno State13233050.3
2022 Regular SeasonFresno State1334351350.3
2023 PostseasonFresno State13577075.1
2023 Regular SeasonFresno State1354694575.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Fresno State paired 771 primary output with 76 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 76 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Fresno State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

59.3

Efficiency

76

Usage

19.2

Consistency

60.4

Best Game by takeover score

Purdue

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 77. Purdue: 170. Eastern Washington: 95. Arizona State: 104. Kent State: 79. Nevada: 37. Wyoming: 9. Utah State: 57. UNLV: 14. Boise State: 0. San José State: 59. New Mexico: 17. San Diego State: 53

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 5 by 100. Purdue: 9 by 100. Eastern Washington: 8 by 79.2. Arizona State: 11 by 63. Kent State: 4 by 100. Nevada: 2 by 100. Wyoming: 2 by 30. Utah State: 3 by 100. UNLV: 2 by 46.7. San José State: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 5 by 22.7. San Diego State: 5 by 70.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins70.3 · Games = 9 · +35.8 vs Losses
Losses34.5 · Games = 4 · -35.8 vs Wins