Player Stats

A'Jon Vivens College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
736
Rushing yards
636
Receiving yards
100
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonColorado State00000-
2018 Regular SeasonColorado State1000050
2019 Regular SeasonColorado State00000-
2020 Regular SeasonColorado State42092081160.3
2021 Regular SeasonColorado State939732473061.1
2022 Regular SeasonColorado State513010426043.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Colorado State paired 397 primary output with 40.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 25.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee

Loss with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Colorado State

Games

5

Scrimmage Yards / G

26

Efficiency

25.1

Usage

17.5

Consistency

65.7

Best Game by takeover score

Middle Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 36. Middle Tennessee: 47. Sacramento State: 31. Nevada: 0. Utah State: 16

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 12 by 34.4. Middle Tennessee: 13 by 36.4. Sacramento State: 10 by 32.3. Nevada: 5 by 0. Utah State: 3 by 22.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -32.5 vs Losses
Losses32.5 · Games = 4 · +32.5 vs Wins