Usage Score
26.9
Player Dossier
2018-2022Kansas State
QB • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Fresno, CA, USA
Adrian Martinez is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
26.9
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
60.4
Season Value
52
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Nebraska
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adrian Martinez, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Nebraska. Adrian Martinez is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Adrian Martinez played QB for Nebraska and Kansas State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Adrian Martinez recorded 9,752 passing yards, 2,928 rushing yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Nebraska.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Nebraska paired 3,388 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Kansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
188.8
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
26.9
Consistency
60.4
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 12. Unknown: 92. Missouri: 153. Tulane: 209. Oklahoma: 382. Texas Tech: 287. Iowa State: 323. TCU: 26. Texas: 381. Baylor: 23
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 2 by 60. Unknown: 28 by 58.2. Missouri: 33 by 56.8. Tulane: 44 by 63.4. Oklahoma: 55 by 72.4. Texas Tech: 31 by 78.5. Iowa State: 38 by 75.9. TCU: 3 by 69.8. Texas: 50 by 67.2. Baylor: 11 by 53.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
78.5 vs Texas Tech
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs Alabama | L 20-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Baylor | W 31-3 | 7 | 8 | 25 | 87.5 | 0 | 0 | 53.4 | 3 | -2 | -0.70 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 27-34 | 24 | 36 | 329 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 67.2 | 14 | 52 | 3.70 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ TCU | L 28-38 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 69.8 | 1 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Iowa StateDual-threat | W 10-9 | 12 | 19 | 246 | 63.2 | 1 | 0 | 75.9 | 19 | 77 | 4.10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Texas Tech3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 37-28 | 12 | 19 | 116 | 63.2 | 1 | 0 | 78.5 | 12 | 171 | 14.30 | 3 | 69 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Oklahoma3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 41-34 | 21 | 34 | 234 | 61.8 | 1 | 0 | 72.4 | 21 | 148 | 7 | 4 | 55 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs TulaneDual-threat | L 10-17 | 21 | 31 | 150 | 67.7 | 1 | 0 | 63.4 | 13 | 59 | 4.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs MissouriDual-threat | W 40-12 | 9 | 20 | 101 | 45.0 | 0 | 0 | 56.8 | 13 | 52 | 4 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 15 | 53 | 73.3 | 0 | 0 | 58.2 | 13 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2018-2021
Opening stop
Kansas State
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Nebraska | 3,246 | 63.8 | 33.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Nebraska | 2,582 | 62.3 | 32.6 | -664 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Nebraska | 1,576 | 70.6 | 31.3 | -1,006 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Nebraska | 3,388 | 67.7 | 31.2 | 1,812 |
| 2022 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,888 | 65.6 | 26.9 | -1,500 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,888 | 65.6 | 26.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
441
Primary metric
441 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#2
Oklahoma
382
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
382 total offense with 72.4 efficiency.
#3
Rutgers
412
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
412 total offense with 75.3 efficiency.
#4
Minnesota
401
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
401 total offense with 87.2 efficiency.
#5
Iowa State
323
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
323 total offense with 75.9 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Nebraska
3,388 primary output · 67.7 efficiency · 31.2 usage
72.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Nebraska
67.5
3,246 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 33.8 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Nebraska
60.9
2,582 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 32.6 usage
30
250+ passing yards
22
300+ total offense
5
3+ takeover TD games
36
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9423
Clovis West · Fresno, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
12,680
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.