Usage Score
31.2
Player Dossier
2018-2021Coastal Carolina
Jaivon Heiligh
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Venice, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jaivon Heiligh reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.2
Consistency
78.3
Season Value
75.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Coastal Carolina
181920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Coastal Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaivon Heiligh, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Coastal Carolina. Jaivon Heiligh reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Coastal Carolina paired 1,128 primary output with 94.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Coastal Carolina
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
86.8
Efficiency
94.2
Usage
31.2
Consistency
78.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 94. Unknown: 133. Kansas: 122. Buffalo: 91. Massachusetts: 118. UL Monroe: 35. Arkansas State: 74. App State: 103. Troy: 116. Georgia Southern: 0. Georgia State: 54. Texas State: 101. South Alabama: 87
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 7 by 89.5. Unknown: 6 by 100. Kansas: 6 by 100. Buffalo: 4 by 100. Massachusetts: 5 by 100. UL Monroe: 3 by 77.8. Arkansas State: 5 by 98.7. App State: 6 by 100. Troy: 5 by 100. Georgia State: 3 by 100. Texas State: 10 by 67.3. South Alabama: 6 by 96.7
Split Comparison
Wins83.8 · n=10 · +5.3 vs Losses
Losses78.5 · n=2 · -5.3 vs Wins
First Half95.3 · n=7 · +18.5 vs Second Half
Second Half76.8 · n=6 · -18.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/17 | vs Northern Illinois | W 47-41 | — | 7 | 94 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 35 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ South Alabama | W 27-21 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Texas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-21 | — | 10 | 101 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Georgia State | L 40-42 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Georgia Southern | W 28-8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/28 | vs Troy100 receiving yards | W 35-28 | — | 5 | 116 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 1 | 66 |
| Wed 10/20 | @ App State100 receiving yards | L 27-30 | — | 6 | 103 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Thu 10/7 | @ Arkansas State | W 52-20 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs UL Monroe | W 59-6 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Massachusetts100 receiving yards | W 53-3 | — | 5 | 118 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Buffalo | W 28-25 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 36 |
| Fri 9/10 | vs Kansas100 receiving yards | W 49-22 | — | 6 | 122 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Thu 9/2 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 133 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Coastal Carolina
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 188 | 79.3 | 11.4 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 497 | 68.6 | 19.3 | 309 |
| 2020 Postseason | Coastal Carolina | 998 | 92.1 | 33.8 | 501 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 998 | 92.1 | 33.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Coastal Carolina | 1,128 | 94.2 | 31.2 | 130 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 1,128 | 94.2 | 31.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Liberty
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178
Primary metric
178 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
133
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Coastal Carolina
1,128 primary output · 94.2 efficiency · 31.2 usage
75.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Coastal Carolina
75.9
1,128 primary · 94.2 efficiency · 31.2 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Coastal Carolina
74.4
998 primary · 92.1 efficiency · 33.8 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8014
Venice · Venice, FL
- Committed To
- Coastal Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,811
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.