Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Utah State paired 987 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah | 7 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 45 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah | 7 | 13 | 171 | 1 | 45 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah State | 13 | 7 | 113 | 2 | 82.6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 13 | 56 | 874 | 8 | 82.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Utah State paired 987 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
19.1
Consistency
73.2
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 113. Wake Forest: 118. Stony Brook: 73. San Diego State: 74. Colorado State: 40. LSU: 45. Nevada: 53. Air Force: 38. BYU: 86. Fresno State: 103. Wyoming: 123. Boise State: 66. New Mexico: 55
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 8 by 98.3. Stony Brook: 5 by 97.3. San Diego State: 7 by 70.5. Colorado State: 2 by 100. LSU: 2 by 100. Nevada: 2 by 100. Air Force: 3 by 84.4. BYU: 5 by 100. Fresno State: 11 by 62.4. Wyoming: 4 by 100. Boise State: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.