Player Stats

Siaosi Mariner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,196
Receptions
80
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonUtah0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonUtah0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonUtah0-00-
2018 PostseasonUtah7438045
2018 Regular SeasonUtah713171145
2019 PostseasonUtah State137113282.6
2019 Regular SeasonUtah State1356874882.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Utah State paired 987 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, Utah State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Utah State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

75.9

Efficiency

93.3

Usage

19.1

Consistency

73.2

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 113. Wake Forest: 118. Stony Brook: 73. San Diego State: 74. Colorado State: 40. LSU: 45. Nevada: 53. Air Force: 38. BYU: 86. Fresno State: 103. Wyoming: 123. Boise State: 66. New Mexico: 55

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 8 by 98.3. Stony Brook: 5 by 97.3. San Diego State: 7 by 70.5. Colorado State: 2 by 100. LSU: 2 by 100. Nevada: 2 by 100. Air Force: 3 by 84.4. BYU: 5 by 100. Fresno State: 11 by 62.4. Wyoming: 4 by 100. Boise State: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins74.4 · Games = 7 · -3.2 vs Losses
Losses77.7 · Games = 6 · +3.2 vs Wins