Player Stats

Mariano Sori-Marin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
265
TFL
13.5
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonMinnesota31-0--039.3
2018 Regular SeasonMinnesota34-0--039.3
2019 PostseasonMinnesota112-0--023
2019 Regular SeasonMinnesota114020--023
2020 Regular SeasonMinnesota7541.50-3041.8
2021 PostseasonMinnesota123-0--059.6
2021 Regular SeasonMinnesota128250-3059.6
2022 PostseasonMinnesota1310.50.5--067.2
2022 Regular SeasonMinnesota13784.5113067.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Minnesota paired 10.5 primary output with 32.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 32.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Postseason · Minnesota

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

32.4

Usage

10.2

Consistency

51.3

Best Game by takeover score

Nebraska

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 1. New Mexico State: 0. Western Illinois: 1. Colorado: 2. Michigan State: 0. Purdue: 1. Illinois: 0. Penn State: 0. Rutgers: 1. Nebraska: 3.5. Northwestern: 0. Iowa: 1. Wisconsin: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 1 by 14.2. New Mexico State: 5 by 20.8. Western Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Colorado: 6 by 45. Michigan State: 9 by 37.5. Purdue: 7 by 39.2. Illinois: 7 by 29.2. Penn State: 15 by 50. Rutgers: 5 by 30.8. Nebraska: 7 by 64.2. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 3 by 22.5. Wisconsin: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 9 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs Wins