Usage Score
10.5
Player Dossier
2019-2023South Florida
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Homestead, FL, USA
Chris Carter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.5
Efficiency
66.4
Consistency
47.3
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · South Florida
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Carter, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · South Florida. Chris Carter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
South Florida paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across South Florida, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
17.8
Efficiency
66.4
Usage
10.5
Consistency
47.3
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 6. Southern Miss: 8. Unknown: 12. UAB: 9. Memphis: 36. Florida Atlantic: 26. UTSA: 33. SMU: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 1 by 40. Southern Miss: 1 by 53.3. Unknown: 2 by 40. UAB: 1 by 60. Memphis: 2 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 57.8. UTSA: 2 by 100. SMU: 1 by 80
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
South Florida
2019-2022
Opening stop
Tulane
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | South Florida | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | South Florida | 24 | 36.7 | 7 | 24 |
| 2021 Regular Season | South Florida | 50 | 55.3 | 9.1 | 26 |
| 2022 Regular Season | South Florida | 9 | 20 | 5.9 | -41 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tulane | 142 | 66.4 | 10.5 | 133 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 142 | 66.4 | 10.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · South Florida
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Postseason · Tulane
56
142 primary · 66.4 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Tulane
56
142 primary · 66.4 efficiency · 10.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8364
South Dade · Homestead, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
225
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chris Carter quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit