Player Stats

Caleb Tremblay College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
39
TFL
8
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonUSC00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonUSC22-0--037
2019 Regular SeasonUSC816321-044
2020 Regular SeasonUSC230.50--022.1
2021 PostseasonTennessee10311--051.7
2021 Regular SeasonTennessee10153.50.52-051.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Tennessee paired 8 primary output with 15.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 15.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Tennessee.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Tennessee

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

15.5

Usage

4.2

Consistency

56.3

Best Game by takeover score

Purdue

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 2. Bowling Green: 1.5. Pittsburgh: 0. Tennessee Tech: 0.5. Florida: 0.5. Missouri: 0.5. Ole Miss: 1. Kentucky: 1. Georgia: 0. South Alabama: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 3 by 32.5. Bowling Green: 2 by 23.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee Tech: 1 by 9.2. Florida: 2 by 13.3. Missouri: 1 by 9.2. Ole Miss: 3 by 22.5. Kentucky: 2 by 18.3. Georgia: 1 by 4.2. South Alabama: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Wins