Usage Score
0.8
Player Dossier
2019-2021Michigan State
Edward Warinner
LB • 6'0" • 224 lbs • Powell, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Edward Warinner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
4.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Michigan State • Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Edward Warinner, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan State. Edward Warinner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.8
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Michigan: 0. Rutgers: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=2
First Half0 · n=2
All Games0 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Rutgers
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2019
Opening stop
- 2
Michigan
2020-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#3
Indiana
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2020 Regular Season · Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8431
Olentangy Liberty · Powell, OH
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.