Player Stats

Xavier Henderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
273
TFL
16.5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonMichigan State1015-0--038.5
2019 PostseasonMichigan State133-0--049.4
2019 Regular SeasonMichigan State138020-6049.4
2020 Regular SeasonMichigan State7411.5011037.9
2021 PostseasonMichigan State132-0--068.9
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan State1394103-2068.9
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan State7383011044.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Michigan State paired 16 primary output with 41.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 29.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Michigan State

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

29.7

Usage

5.9

Consistency

69.4

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 1. Wisconsin: 1. Michigan: 1. Illinois: 0. Rutgers: 1. Indiana: 0. Penn State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 0 by 10. Wisconsin: 5 by 30.8. Michigan: 8 by 43.3. Illinois: 4 by 16.7. Rutgers: 5 by 30.8. Indiana: 8 by 33.3. Penn State: 8 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 4 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · -0.1 vs Wins