Usage Score
28.5
Player Dossier
2018-2020Louisville
Tutu Atwell
WR • 5'9" • 165 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tutu Atwell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
68.8
Season Value
57.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Louisville
18191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tutu Atwell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Louisville. Tutu Atwell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tutu Atwell played WR for Louisville. Across 3 tracked seasons, Tutu Atwell recorded 33 passing yards, 22 rushing yards, and 2,307 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Louisville.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Louisville paired 1,276 primary output with 92.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Louisville
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
69.4
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
28.5
Consistency
68.8
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 78. Miami: 114. Pittsburgh: 37. Georgia Tech: 52. Notre Dame: 40. Florida State: 129. Virginia Tech: 78. Syracuse: 19. Boston College: 78
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 7 by 74.3. Miami: 8 by 95. Pittsburgh: 4 by 61.7. Georgia Tech: 6 by 57.8. Notre Dame: 4 by 66.7. Florida State: 3 by 100. Virginia Tech: 8 by 65. Syracuse: 1 by 100. Boston College: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins75.3 · Games = 3 · +8.8 vs Losses
Losses66.5 · Games = 6 · -8.8 vs Wins
First Half64.2 · Games = 5 · -11.8 vs Second Half
Second Half76 · Games = 4 · +11.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ Boston College | L 27-34 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Syracuse | W 30-0 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Virginia TechHigh volume | L 35-42 | — | 8 | 78 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Florida State100 receiving yards | W 48-16 | — | 3 | 129 | 32.8 | 43 | 1 | 66 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Notre Dame | L 7-12 | — | 4 | 40 | 7.2 | 10 | 0 | 28 |
| Fri 10/9 | @ Georgia Tech | L 27-46 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Pittsburgh | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-47 | — | 8 | 114 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 2 | 33 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Western Kentucky | W 35-21 | — | 7 | 78 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisville | 406 | 80.7 | 11.3 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisville | 1,276 | 92.7 | 40.8 | 870 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisville | 1,276 | 92.7 | 40.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisville | 625 | 80.1 | 28.5 | -651 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
145
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Louisville
1,276 primary output · 92.7 efficiency · 40.8 usage
76.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Louisville
76.7
1,276 primary · 92.7 efficiency · 40.8 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Louisville
57.8
625 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 28.5 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8646
Northwestern · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Louisville
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,307
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.