Player Stats

Trey Cobb College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
254
TFL
21
Sacks
4
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
7
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonApp State81-0--039
2018 Regular SeasonApp State813-0--039
2019 PostseasonApp State141-0--124.7
2019 Regular SeasonApp State144830.521024.7
2020 PostseasonApp State1212-0--072.8
2020 Regular SeasonApp State12799.5361072.8
2021 PostseasonApp State146-0--049.7
2021 Regular SeasonApp State14666014249.7
2022 Regular SeasonApp State6282.50.5-1026.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

App State paired 19.5 primary output with 47.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: James Madison

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · App State

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

26.1

Usage

5.8

Consistency

11.1

Best Game by takeover score

James Madison

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 1. Texas A&M: 0. James Madison: 3. The Citadel: 0. Texas State: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 5 by 30.8. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. James Madison: 9 by 67.5. The Citadel: 3 by 12.5. Texas State: 1 by 4.2. Coastal Carolina: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 2 · -1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · +1 vs Wins