Player Dossier

2018-2020

Stanford

Simi Fehoko

WR • 6'4" • 220 lbs • Sandy, UT, USA

Alpha targetExplosive finisher

Simi Fehoko reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

24.4

Efficiency

90.2

Consistency

55.4

Season Value

67.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Stanford

181920

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
3
Program Path
Stanford
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Simi Fehoko, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Stanford. Simi Fehoko reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Stanford paired 566 primary output with 96.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 90.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCLA

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Stanford

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

97.3

Efficiency

90.2

Usage

24.4

Consistency

55.4

Best Game by takeover score

UCLA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 88. Colorado: 74. California: 21. Washington: 61. Oregon State: 110. UCLA: 230

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 3 by 100. Colorado: 5 by 98.7. California: 3 by 46.7. Washington: 4 by 100. Oregon State: 6 by 100. UCLA: 16 by 95.8

Split Comparison

Wins105.5 · n=4 · +24.5 vs Losses
Losses81 · n=2 · -24.5 vs Wins
First Half61 · n=3 · -72.7 vs Second Half
Second Half133.7 · n=3 · +72.7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

6 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

UCLA

Best efficiency game

100 vs Oregon State

Result
Sun 12/20@ UCLA100 receiving yards · High volumeW 48-471623014.414.40345
Sun 12/13@ Oregon State100 receiving yardsW 27-24611018.318.30057
Sat 12/5@ WashingtonW 31-2646115.315.30025
Fri 11/27@ CaliforniaW 24-2332177011
Sat 11/14vs ColoradoL 32-3557414.814.80034
Sun 11/8@ OregonL 14-3538821.829.30046

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Stanford

    2018-2020

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201820192020
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2018 Regular SeasonStanford6404
2019 Regular SeasonStanford56696.711.2560
2020 Regular SeasonStanford58490.224.418

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UCLA

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

230

Primary metric

230 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.

#2

Colorado

96

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Arizona

97

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Washington

91

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Washington State

92

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2019 Regular Season · Stanford

566 primary output · 96.7 efficiency · 11.2 usage

69.2

#2

2020 Regular Season · Stanford

67.4

584 primary · 90.2 efficiency · 24.4 usage

#3

2018 Regular Season · Stanford

36.3

6 primary · 40 efficiency · 4 usage

Milestones

2

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2016 · Rating 0.9316

Brighton · Salt Lake City, UT

Committed To
Stanford
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2016

Career Facts

1

Career teams

3

Seasons tracked

1,156

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Simi Fehoko quick answers

Recruiting profile

4-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
3
Career receiving yards
1,156