Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2017-2022SMU
Ben Redding
TE • 6'5" • 233 lbs • Friendswood, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Ben Redding reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
50.3
Consistency
65.7
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · SMU
171819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Redding, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · SMU. Ben Redding reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
SMU paired 107 primary output with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · SMU
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
17.8
Efficiency
50.3
Usage
8.3
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 2. Unknown: 1. UCF: 35. Cincinnati: 25. Tulsa: 20. Houston: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 1 by 13.3. Unknown: 1 by 6.7. UCF: 4 by 58.3. Cincinnati: 2 by 83.3. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Houston: 4 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins15.3 · Games = 3 · -14.7 vs Losses
Losses30 · Games = 2 · +14.7 vs Wins
First Half12.7 · Games = 3 · -10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half23 · Games = 3 · +10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2017-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 49 | 65.6 | 5.1 | 49 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -49 |
| 2020 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | SMU | 5 | 33.3 | 2.6 | 5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | SMU | 107 | 50.3 | 8.3 | 102 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
29
Primary metric
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
UCF
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 58.3 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · SMU
107 primary output · 50.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
54.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · SMU
43.4
49 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 5.1 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · SMU
12.8
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 2.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8255
Friendswood · Friendswood, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
161
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.