Player Stats

Trevor Denbow College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
183
TFL
13.5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonSMU00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonSMU11424.51.511048.6
2019 PostseasonSMU129-0--033.6
2019 Regular SeasonSMU125520.5-4033.6
2020 Regular SeasonSMU10377111061.3
2021 Regular SeasonSMU1040-012031

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

SMU paired 11 primary output with 26.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 21.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Abilene Christian

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · SMU

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

21.7

Usage

5.6

Consistency

10

Best Game by takeover score

Abilene Christian

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Abilene Christian: 3. North Texas: 1. TCU: 0. South Florida: 0. Navy: 0. Tulane: 0. Houston: 0. Memphis: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Tulsa: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Abilene Christian: 2 by 38.3. North Texas: 8 by 43.3. TCU: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 4 by 16.7. Navy: 5 by 20.8. Tulane: 4 by 16.7. Houston: 6 by 25. Memphis: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 3 by 12.5. Tulsa: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs Wins