Player Stats

Ahrod Lloyd College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
19
Rushing yards
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonIndiana1000050
2019 PostseasonIndiana6220038.9
2019 Regular SeasonIndiana617170038.9
2020 Regular SeasonIndiana00000-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Indiana paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 20.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Loss with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Indiana

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

3.2

Efficiency

20.3

Usage

2.9

Consistency

26.9

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 2. Eastern Illinois: 1. Ohio State: 0. Rutgers: 4. Penn State: 0. Michigan: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 1 by 20.8. Eastern Illinois: 1 by 10.4. Rutgers: 5 by 8.3. Michigan: 3 by 41.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.5 · Games = 2 · -1 vs Losses
Losses3.5 · Games = 4 · +1 vs Wins