Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2018-2022Duke
Jake Bobo
WR • 6'5" • 215 lbs • Belmont, MA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jake Bobo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.7
Consistency
69.3
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UCLA
18181920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Duke • UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jake Bobo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UCLA. Jake Bobo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
UCLA paired 817 primary output with 83.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Duke, UCLA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UCLA
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.8
Efficiency
83.7
Usage
20
Consistency
69.3
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 28. Bowling Green: 38. Unknown: 41. South Alabama: 89. Colorado: 53. Washington: 142. Utah: 22. Oregon: 101. Stanford: 40. Arizona State: 64. Arizona: 61. USC: 76. California: 62
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 3 by 62.2. Bowling Green: 3 by 84.4. Unknown: 3 by 91.1. South Alabama: 5 by 100. Colorado: 4 by 88.3. Washington: 6 by 100. Utah: 3 by 48.9. Oregon: 8 by 84.2. Stanford: 3 by 88.9. Arizona State: 3 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 81.3. USC: 4 by 100. California: 7 by 59
Split Comparison
Wins63.8 · n=8 · -2.8 vs Losses
Losses66.5 · n=4 · +2.8 vs Wins
First Half59 · n=7 · -8.3 vs Second Half
Second Half67.3 · n=6 · +8.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Pittsburgh | L 35-37 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ California | W 35-28 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs USC | L 45-48 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Arizona | L 28-34 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Arizona State | W 50-36 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Stanford | W 38-13 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-45 | — | 8 | 101 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Utah2+ TD | W 42-32 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 2 | 10 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Washington100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 40-32 | — | 6 | 142 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Colorado | W 45-17 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs South Alabama | W 32-31 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Bowling Green | W 45-17 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
UCLA
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201820192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Duke | 167 | 80.7 | 5.2 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Duke | 167 | 80.7 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Duke | 122 | 78.3 | 10.2 | -45 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Duke | 348 | 79.3 | 14 | 226 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Duke | 794 | 70.2 | 27.9 | 446 |
| 2022 Postseason | UCLA | 817 | 83.7 | 20 | 23 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UCLA | 817 | 83.7 | 20 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
35
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
92
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · UCLA
817 primary output · 83.7 efficiency · 20 usage
68.3
#2
2022 Regular Season · UCLA
68.3
817 primary · 83.7 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Duke
65.9
794 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 27.9 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8431
Belmont Hill School · Belmont, MA
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,248
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.