Usage Score
21.7
Player Dossier
2018-2020Clemson
QB • 6'6" • 220 lbs • Cartersville, GA, USA
Trevor Lawrence is a balanced quarterback profile with 21.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
21.7
Efficiency
69
Consistency
85.7
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trevor Lawrence, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Clemson. Trevor Lawrence is a balanced quarterback profile with 21.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Trevor Lawrence played QB for Clemson. Across 3 tracked seasons, Trevor Lawrence recorded 10,098 passing yards, 943 rushing yards, and -4 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Clemson paired 4,228 primary output with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 69 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
335.6
Efficiency
69
Usage
21.7
Consistency
85.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 392. Wake Forest: 327. Unknown: 170. Virginia: 365. Miami: 326. Georgia Tech: 410. Syracuse: 306. Pittsburgh: 412. Virginia Tech: 236. Notre Dame: 412
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 58 by 57.5. Wake Forest: 35 by 69.6. Unknown: 10 by 77.2. Virginia: 44 by 74.5. Miami: 49 by 68.1. Georgia Tech: 35 by 70.6. Syracuse: 47 by 63. Pittsburgh: 45 by 68.1. Virginia Tech: 29 by 67.2. Notre Dame: 50 by 74.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
77.2 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Ohio State300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 28-49 | 33 | 48 | 400 | 68.8 | 2 | 1 | 57.5 | 10 | -8 | -0.80 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 12/19 | @ Notre Dame300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 34-10 | 25 | 36 | 322 | 69.4 | 2 | 1 | 74.3 | 14 | 90 | 6.40 | 1 | 34 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Virginia Tech3+ TD | W 45-10 | 12 | 22 | 195 | 54.5 | 1 | 1 | 67.2 | 7 | 41 | 5.90 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Pittsburgh300-yard game | W 52-17 | 26 | 37 | 403 | 70.3 | 2 | 0 | 68.1 | 8 | 9 | 1.10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Syracuse | W 47-21 | 27 | 43 | 289 | 62.8 | 2 | 1 | 63 | 4 | 17 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Georgia Tech300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 73-7 | 24 | 32 | 404 | 75.0 | 5 | 1 | 70.6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Miami3+ TD | W 42-17 | 29 | 41 | 292 | 70.7 | 3 | 0 | 68.1 | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Virginia300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-23 | 25 | 38 | 329 | 65.8 | 3 | 0 | 74.5 | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 8 | 9 | 168 | 88.9 | 3 | 0 | 77.2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Wake Forest300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 37-13 | 22 | 28 | 351 | 78.6 | 1 | 0 | 69.6 | 7 | -24 | -3.40 | 2 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 3,457 | 66.3 | 11.1 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 3,457 | 66.3 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Clemson | 4,228 | 73.5 | 21 | 771 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 4,228 | 73.5 | 21 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 3,356 | 69 | 21.7 | -872 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 3,356 | 69 | 21.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
412
Primary metric
412 total offense with 74.3 efficiency.
#2
Ohio State
366
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
366 total offense with 71.7 efficiency.
#3
South Carolina
435
Primary metric
Win with 435 yards of offense and 91.5 efficiency.
435 total offense with 91.5 efficiency.
#4
Ohio State
392
Primary metric
Loss with 392 yards of offense and 57.5 efficiency.
392 total offense with 57.5 efficiency.
#5
Syracuse
437
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
437 total offense with 80.1 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Clemson
4,228 primary output · 73.5 efficiency · 21 usage
69.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Clemson
69.5
4,228 primary · 73.5 efficiency · 21 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Clemson
67.3
3,356 primary · 69 efficiency · 21.7 usage
27
250+ passing yards
20
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
35
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9999
Cartersville · Cartersville, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
11,041
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.