Usage Score
27.1
Player Dossier
2018-2023Oklahoma
Drake Stoops
WR • 5'10" • 189 lbs • Norman, OK, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Drake Stoops reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.7
Consistency
59.9
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
1819192020212122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 11
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drake Stoops, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Oklahoma. Drake Stoops reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 962 primary output with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
74
Efficiency
74.7
Usage
27.1
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 82. Arkansas State: 56. SMU: 17. Tulsa: 53. Cincinnati: 45. Iowa State: 32. Texas: 55. UCF: 60. Kansas: 76. Oklahoma State: 134. West Virginia: 164. BYU: 63. TCU: 125
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 6 by 91.1. Arkansas State: 4 by 93.3. SMU: 2 by 56.7. Tulsa: 8 by 44.2. Cincinnati: 6 by 50. Iowa State: 5 by 42.7. Texas: 4 by 91.7. UCF: 7 by 57.1. Kansas: 4 by 100. Oklahoma State: 12 by 74.4. West Virginia: 10 by 100. BYU: 4 by 100. TCU: 12 by 69.4
Split Comparison
Wins67 · n=10 · -30.3 vs Losses
Losses97.3 · n=3 · +30.3 vs Wins
First Half48.6 · n=7 · -55.1 vs Second Half
Second Half103.7 · n=6 · +55.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Arizona | L 24-38 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs TCU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 69-45 | — | 12 | 125 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ BYU | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 63 | 12.2 | 15.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs West Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-20 | — | 10 | 164 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 3 | 60 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-27 | — | 12 | 134 | 9.8 | 11.20 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kansas | L 33-38 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UCF | W 31-29 | — | 7 | 60 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas | W 34-30 | — | 4 | 55 | 11.6 | 13.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Iowa State | W 50-20 | — | 5 | 32 | 7.5 | 6.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-6 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ TulsaHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 66-17 | — | 8 | 53 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 2 | 16 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs SMU | W 28-11 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Arkansas State | W 73-0 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2018-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202020202120212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 16 | 53.3 | 10.5 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 95 | 75 | 7.4 | 79 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 95 | 75 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma | 219 | 74.8 | 7.6 | 124 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 219 | 74.8 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma | 191 | 72.5 | 9.4 | -28 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 191 | 72.5 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Oklahoma | 393 | 63.2 | 17.3 | 202 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 393 | 63.2 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma | 962 | 74.7 | 27.1 | 569 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 962 | 74.7 | 27.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164
Primary metric
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
LSU
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
962 primary output · 74.7 efficiency · 27.1 usage
65.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma
65.4
962 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 27.1 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Oklahoma
47.4
393 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 17.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8315
Norman North · Norman, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
11
Seasons tracked
1,876
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 11 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.