Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2018-2022Oklahoma
Jalen Redmond
DL • 6'3" • 298 lbs • Midwest City, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jalen Redmond shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
25.1
Consistency
68.2
Season Value
44
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
18191920212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Redmond, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oklahoma. Jalen Redmond shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 19.5 primary output with 29.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 25.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
25.1
Usage
7.7
Consistency
68.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 1. Kent State: 2.5. Nebraska: 2. Kansas State: 1.5. TCU: 0. Texas: 0. Kansas: 1.5. Iowa State: 1.5. Baylor: 3. Oklahoma State: 2. Texas Tech: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 1 by 14.2. Kent State: 3 by 37.5. Nebraska: 1 by 24.2. Kansas State: 4 by 31.7. TCU: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Kansas: 1 by 19.2. Iowa State: 3 by 27.5. Baylor: 2 by 38.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 24.2. Texas Tech: 3 by 42.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.8 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · Games = 6 · -1.0 vs Second Half
Second Half2.2 · Games = 5 · +1.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Texas Tech | L 48-51 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Oklahoma State | W 28-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs BaylorSplash game | L 35-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Iowa State | W 27-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Kansas | W 52-42 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Texas | L 0-49 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TCU | L 24-55 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Kansas State | L 34-41 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Nebraska | W 49-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Kent StateSplash game | W 33-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UTEP | W 45-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 2.5 | 25 | 11.6 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 19.5 | 29.1 | 11.6 | 17 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 19.5 | 29.1 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | -19.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma | 11.5 | 24.2 | 7.4 | 11.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 11.5 | 24.2 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 18 | 25.1 | 7.7 | 6.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#2
Kansas State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#4
Texas Tech
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.6 takeover score.
#5
Baylor
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
19.5 primary output · 29.1 efficiency · 11.6 usage
46.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Oklahoma
46.8
19.5 primary · 29.1 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma
44
18 primary · 25.1 efficiency · 7.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9442
Midwest City · Oklahoma City, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
71
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.