Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Utah paired 801 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 7 | 191 | 179 | 12 | 0 | 32.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 22.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 7 | 62 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 22.4 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 9 | 529 | 452 | 77 | 5 | 51.4 |
| 2021 Postseason | Utah | 14 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 60.6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Utah | 14 | 778 | 671 | 107 | 6 | 60.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Utah paired 801 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Utah.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
57.2
Efficiency
58
Usage
14
Consistency
44.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 23. Weber State: 10. BYU: 8. San Diego State: 18. Washington State: 117. USC: 24. Arizona State: 57. Oregon State: 29. UCLA: 68. Stanford: 116. Arizona: 162. Oregon: 46. Colorado: 103. Oregon: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 7 by 34.2. Weber State: 2 by 52.1. BYU: 2 by 35.4. San Diego State: 5 by 15. Washington State: 10 by 98.8. USC: 6 by 34.2. Arizona State: 8 by 73.4. Oregon State: 5 by 61.7. UCLA: 9 by 79.1. Stanford: 6 by 100. Arizona: 26 by 55.7. Oregon: 10 by 47.9. Colorado: 13 by 82.5. Oregon: 5 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.