Usage Score
1.7
Player Dossier
2018-2023Purdue
Malik Langham
DL • 6'4" • 310 lbs • Huntsville, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Malik Langham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
7.9
Consistency
100
Season Value
36.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue
181920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Florida • Vanderbilt • Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malik Langham, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue. Malik Langham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with 7.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 7.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Vanderbilt, Purdue.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
7.9
Usage
1.7
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Syracuse: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Illinois: 0. Iowa: 0. Nebraska: 0. Michigan: 0. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. Virginia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 2 by 8.3. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Iowa: 4 by 16.7. Nebraska: 0 by 0. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Northwestern: 2 by 8.3. Indiana: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
16.7 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 35-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Northwestern | L 15-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Michigan | L 13-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Nebraska | L 14-31 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Iowa | L 14-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Illinois | W 44-19 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/22 | vs Wisconsin | L 17-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Syracuse | L 20-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 24-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Fresno State | L 35-39 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida
2018
Opening stop
- 2
Vanderbilt
2019-2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Purdue
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Florida | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | 4.9 | 1 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 3 | 13.3 | 7 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0.5 | 9.9 | 2.2 | -2.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 7.9 | 1.7 | -0.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#2
Missouri
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.1 takeover score.
#3
Wake Forest
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 21.3 takeover score.
#4
Iowa
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7 takeover score.
#5
Georgia
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · 7.9 efficiency · 1.7 usage
36.5
#2
2020 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
35.3
0 primary · 4.9 efficiency · 1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Florida
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8975
Lee · Huntsville, AL
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
52
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.