Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Boston College paired 11 primary output with 39.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Boston College | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 39 |
| 2019 Postseason | Boston College | 10 | 4 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 42.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Boston College | 10 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2021 Regular Season | Boston College | 12 | 54 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 31.2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boston College | 12 | 87 | 7 | 1 | 3 | - | 0 | 71.8 |
| 2023 Postseason | Boston College | 13 | 5 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 36.2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boston College | 13 | 87 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 36.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Boston College paired 11 primary output with 39.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Holy Cross
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
32.6
Usage
7.9
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Holy Cross
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Holy Cross: 1. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 0. Virginia: 1. Army: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. UConn: 1. Syracuse: 0. Virginia Tech: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Miami: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 5 by 20.8. Northern Illinois: 12 by 50. Holy Cross: 9 by 47.5. Florida State: 7 by 29.2. Louisville: 6 by 25. Virginia: 6 by 35. Army: 9 by 37.5. Georgia Tech: 4 by 16.7. UConn: 5 by 30.8. Syracuse: 10 by 41.7. Virginia Tech: 8 by 43.3. Pittsburgh: 7 by 29.2. Miami: 4 by 16.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.