Player Stats

Donavan Mutin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
245
TFL
18
Sacks
3
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonHouston57-0--037.7
2019 Regular SeasonHouston12614.504-057
2020 Regular SeasonHouston322211-054.2
2021 PostseasonHouston1381.50--068.3
2021 Regular SeasonHouston1369523-068.3
2022 Regular SeasonHouston11785024066

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Houston paired 11.5 primary output with 33.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 39.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Houston

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

39.2

Usage

7.7

Consistency

65.3

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 1. Texas Tech: 2.5. Kansas: 0. Tulane: 1. Memphis: 1.5. Navy: 0. South Florida: 1. SMU: 2. Temple: 1. East Carolina: 0. Tulsa: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 11 by 55.8. Texas Tech: 9 by 62.5. Kansas: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 3 by 22.5. Memphis: 6 by 40. Navy: 13 by 50. South Florida: 3 by 22.5. SMU: 11 by 65.8. Temple: 8 by 43.3. East Carolina: 5 by 20.8. Tulsa: 6 by 35

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs Wins