Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Houston paired 4,621 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Houston | 5 | 246 | 230 | 16 | 2 | 46 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 5 | 602 | 565 | 37 | 7 | 46 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 7 | 1,777 | 1,533 | 244 | 13 | 57 |
| 2020 Postseason | Houston | 8 | 200 | 216 | -16 | 2 | 62.3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 8 | 2,101 | 1,832 | 269 | 18 | 62.3 |
| 2021 Postseason | Houston | 14 | 326 | 283 | 43 | 2 | 66.7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Houston | 14 | 3,374 | 3,263 | 111 | 30 | 66.7 |
| 2022 Postseason | Houston | 13 | 284 | 229 | 55 | 3 | 78.8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Houston | 13 | 4,337 | 3,845 | 492 | 42 | 78.8 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Houston paired 4,621 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
355.5
Efficiency
68
Usage
33.1
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 284. UTSA: 257. Texas Tech: 264. Kansas: 335. Rice: 275. Tulane: 264. Memphis: 386. Navy: 304. South Florida: 399. SMU: 638. Temple: 318. East Carolina: 478. Tulsa: 419
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 39 by 70.6. UTSA: 47 by 64.1. Texas Tech: 45 by 49.5. Kansas: 47 by 67.6. Rice: 34 by 67.5. Tulane: 47 by 64.8. Memphis: 64 by 59.6. Navy: 39 by 72.6. South Florida: 40 by 83.2. SMU: 65 by 80.2. Temple: 51 by 62.3. East Carolina: 50 by 79.4. Tulsa: 57 by 62.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.