Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2019-2023Cincinnati
DB • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Solon, OH, USA
Taj Ward shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
6
Efficiency
24.1
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
13.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taj Ward, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Taj Ward shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.1 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 0 primary output with 7.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 24.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
24.1
Usage
6
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Miami (OH): 1. Oklahoma: 2. BYU: 0. Iowa State: 0. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma State: 1. UCF: 1. Houston: 0. West Virginia: 0. Kansas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 35. Pittsburgh: 4 by 16.7. Miami (OH): 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma: 9 by 57.5. BYU: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 3 by 12.5. Baylor: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma State: 2 by 18.3. UCF: 5 by 30.8. Houston: 3 by 12.5. West Virginia: 7 by 29.2. Kansas: 7 by 29.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | vs Kansas | L 16-49 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ West Virginia | L 21-42 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Houston | W 24-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UCF | L 26-28 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Baylor | L 29-32 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Iowa State | L 10-30 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ BYU | L 27-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs OklahomaSplash game | L 6-20 | 9 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Miami (OH) | L 24-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Pittsburgh | W 27-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 0 | 7.2 | 1.3 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 0 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 7.3 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 6.5 | 17 | 2.8 | 6.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 6 | 24.1 | 6 | -0.5 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.1 takeover score.
#3
South Florida
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 34.2 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.5 takeover score.
#5
UCF
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
0 primary output · 7.3 efficiency · 1.2 usage
36.2
#2
2019 Postseason · Cincinnati
36.1
0 primary · 7.2 efficiency · 1.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Cincinnati
36.1
0 primary · 7.2 efficiency · 1.3 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8356
Solon · Solon, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
98
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Taj Ward quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit