Usage Score
6.6
Player Dossier
2018-2022Cincinnati
Ty Van Fossen
LB • 6'2" • 222 lbs • Croton, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ty Van Fossen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.1
Consistency
45.2
Season Value
22.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
1819192020212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ty Van Fossen, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati. Ty Van Fossen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 1 primary output with 10 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 29.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
29.1
Usage
6.6
Consistency
45.2
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 0. Unknown: 1. Miami (OH): 1. Indiana: 0. Tulsa: 1. South Florida: 1. SMU: 0. UCF: 0. Navy: 0. East Carolina: 1. Temple: 2. Tulane: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Miami (OH): 1 by 14.2. Indiana: 5 by 20.8. Tulsa: 4 by 26.7. South Florida: 16 by 60. SMU: 4 by 16.7. UCF: 8 by 33.3. Navy: 9 by 37.5. East Carolina: 7 by 39.2. Temple: 6 by 45. Tulane: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=8 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=6 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
60 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Tulane | L 24-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Temple | W 23-3 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs East Carolina | W 27-25 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Navy | W 20-10 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UCF | L 21-25 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ SMU | W 29-27 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs South Florida10+ tackles | W 28-24 | 16 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Tulsa | W 31-21 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Indiana | W 45-24 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Miami (OH) | W 38-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas | L 24-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1 | 10 | 0 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1.5 | 13.8 | 2.4 | 0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1.5 | 13.8 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 7 | 20.7 | 6.9 | 5.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 7 | 20.7 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Cincinnati | 8.5 | 26.9 | 6 | 1.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 8.5 | 26.9 | 6 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 7 | 29.1 | 6.6 | -1.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#2
Houston
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.7 takeover score.
#3
UConn
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
Temple
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#5
South Florida
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
1 primary output · 10 efficiency · 0 usage
27.8
#2
2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
22.7
7 primary · 29.1 efficiency · 6.6 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
18.8
8.5 primary · 26.9 efficiency · 6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.841
St. Francis de Sales · Columbus, OH
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
182
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.