Player Stats

Arquon Bush College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
113
TFL
5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
21
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonCincinnati13-0-2268.6
2019 Regular SeasonCincinnati716-0-5019.6
2020 PostseasonCincinnati94-0-1037.2
2020 Regular SeasonCincinnati91620-2037.2
2021 PostseasonCincinnati13410--054.2
2021 Regular SeasonCincinnati13362116054.2
2022 Regular SeasonCincinnati1234-0-5025.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Cincinnati paired 4 primary output with 52.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 17.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

17.6

Usage

2.4

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 0. Kennesaw State: 0. Miami (OH): 2. Indiana: 0. Tulsa: 1. South Florida: 0. SMU: 1. UCF: 0. Navy: 1. East Carolina: 2. Temple: 0. Tulane: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 1 by 4.2. Kennesaw State: 3 by 12.5. Miami (OH): 5 by 40.8. Indiana: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 1 by 14.2. South Florida: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 4 by 26.7. UCF: 5 by 20.8. Navy: 2 by 18.3. East Carolina: 2 by 28.3. Temple: 1 by 4.2. Tulane: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 9 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.8 vs Wins