Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Charlotte paired 19.5 primary output with 30.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Amir Siddiq College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 104
- TFL
- 23
- Sacks
- 13
- QB hurries
- 10
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 3 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0 | 10.9 |
| 2019 Postseason | Central Michigan | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 12.8 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 12.8 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 6 | 10 | 3 | 3 | - | - | 0 | 26.9 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 12 | 33 | 9.5 | 4 | 4 | - | 0 | 64.2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Charlotte | 12 | 47 | 8 | 5.5 | 6 | - | 0 | 65.1 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Charlotte.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Charlotte
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
30.9
Usage
11.4
Consistency
34.4
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. William & Mary: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Maryland: 0. Georgia State: 2. South Carolina: 3. UTEP: 2.5. UAB: 3. Florida International: 1. Rice: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Middle Tennessee: 7. Louisiana Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. William & Mary: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 25. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 2 by 38.3. UTEP: 5 by 45.8. UAB: 7 by 59.2. Florida International: 6 by 35. Rice: 4 by 16.7. Western Kentucky: 0 by 10. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 79.2. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 3 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.9 · Games = 9 · +1.3 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Amir Siddiq
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.