Usage Score
10.5
Player Dossier
2018-2022Central Michigan
Amir Siddiq
DL • 6'2" • 245 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Amir Siddiq shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
19.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Central Michigan
181919202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Central Michigan • Charlotte
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amir Siddiq, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Amir Siddiq shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 13.5 primary output with 22.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Charlotte.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Charlotte
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
10.5
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Maryland: 0. Georgia State: 2. South Carolina: 2. UTEP: 1.5. UAB: 2. Florida International: 0. Rice: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Middle Tennessee: 6. Louisiana Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 25. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 2 by 28.3. UTEP: 5 by 35.8. UAB: 7 by 49.2. Florida International: 6 by 25. Rice: 4 by 16.7. Western Kentucky: 0 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 79.2. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.7 · n=3 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · n=8 · +0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=6 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 26-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Middle Tennessee2+ sacks · Splash game | L 14-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 3.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Western Kentucky | L 7-59 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Rice | W 56-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Florida International | L 15-34 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ UAB | L 20-34 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs UTEP | L 35-41 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Carolina | L 20-56 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Georgia State | W 42-41 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Maryland | L 21-56 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 13-43 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Charlotte
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1 | 8.9 | 2.5 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Central Michigan | 2 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 2 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 6 | 17 | 6.9 | 4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 13.5 | 22.7 | 8.6 | 7.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Charlotte | 13.5 | 26.7 | 10.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 69.9 takeover score.
#2
Ohio
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
#3
Kent State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#4
San Diego State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#5
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Central Michigan
13.5 primary output · 22.7 efficiency · 8.6 usage
30.5
#2
2022 Regular Season · Charlotte
19.8
13.5 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Central Michigan
11.9
6 primary · 17 efficiency · 6.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7678
Fordson · Dearborn, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
104
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.