Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 3,208 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.8 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 5 | 231 | 221 | 10 | 3 | 26.2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 2 | 73 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 29.8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 8 | 1,436 | 1,318 | 118 | 16 | 47.6 |
| 2022 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 12 | 145 | 236 | -91 | 2 | 72.2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 12 | 3,063 | 2,920 | 143 | 25 | 72.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 3,208 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 386 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
267.3
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
25.8
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 145. James Madison: 91. Colorado State: 290. Tennessee State: 239. Miami: 437. UTSA: 386. UAB: 194. Western Kentucky: 257. UTEP: 252. Louisiana Tech: 148. Florida Atlantic: 458. Florida International: 311
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 52 by 49.2. James Madison: 40 by 46.2. Colorado State: 51 by 61.5. Tennessee State: 30 by 70. Miami: 34 by 70.1. UTSA: 65 by 59.3. UAB: 51 by 47.3. Western Kentucky: 60 by 56.1. UTEP: 33 by 64.9. Louisiana Tech: 30 by 48.3. Florida Atlantic: 64 by 61.5. Florida International: 52 by 64.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.