Player Stats

Troy Hairston College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
129
TFL
30.5
Sacks
15.5
QB hurries
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan55-0--036.6
2019 PostseasonCentral Michigan11520--030.7
2019 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan1123322-030.7
2020 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan6429.55.53-073.5
2021 PostseasonCentral Michigan1342.51.51-073.2
2021 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan135013.56.55-073.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Central Michigan paired 18 primary output with 59.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 39.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Central Michigan

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

39.6

Usage

11.9

Consistency

54

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 5. Missouri: 0. Robert Morris: 0. LSU: 3. Florida International: 6. Miami (OH): 0.5. Ohio: 1.5. Toledo: 3.5. Northern Illinois: 3. Western Michigan: 2. Kent State: 1. Ball State: 1. Eastern Michigan: 3.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 4 by 66.7. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Robert Morris: 1 by 4.2. LSU: 2 by 38.3. Florida International: 5 by 70.8. Miami (OH): 6 by 30. Ohio: 3 by 27.5. Toledo: 5 by 55.8. Northern Illinois: 7 by 59.2. Western Michigan: 2 by 28.3. Kent State: 5 by 30.8. Ball State: 6 by 35. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 64.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.6 · Games = 9 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · Games = 4 · -1.0 vs Wins