Player Stats

Asher Frow College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
16
TFL
2
Sacks
2
QB hurries
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonNorth Texas00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonNorth Texas00-0--0-
2019 Regular SeasonNorth Texas69221-040.4
2020 Regular SeasonNorth Texas21-01-025.2
2021 Regular SeasonKent State56-0--037.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

North Texas paired 5 primary output with 14.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across North Texas, Kent State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo

Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Kent State

Games

5

Havoc Plays / G

0

Efficiency

5

Usage

0.8

Consistency

100

Best Game by takeover score

Buffalo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. VMI: 0. Iowa: 0. Maryland: 0. Buffalo: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. VMI: 1 by 4.2. Iowa: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Buffalo: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins