Usage Score
0.7
Player Dossier
2017-2017UTEP
Joseph Pickney
DB • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Crosby, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Joseph Pickney shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
4.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP
17
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joseph Pickney, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP. Joseph Pickney shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Joseph Pickney played DB for UTEP. Across 1 tracked season, Joseph Pickney recorded 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.7
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico State: 1 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0 · Games = 3
First Half0 · Games = 2
All Games0 · Games = 3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Middle Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#3
Arizona
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7859
Crosby · Crosby, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
3
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.