Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2017-2020Purdue
Cornel Jones
LB • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cornel Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
38.8
Consistency
30.7
Season Value
27.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Purdue
17181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cornel Jones, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Purdue. Cornel Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with 5.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 38.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
38.8
Usage
14.6
Consistency
30.7
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 3. Eastern Michigan: 6. Missouri: 1. Boston College: 0.5. Nebraska: 0. Illinois: 4. Ohio State: 1. Michigan State: 0.5. Iowa: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Indiana: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 6 by 55. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 87.5. Missouri: 7 by 39.2. Boston College: 7 by 34.2. Nebraska: 6 by 25. Illinois: 5 by 60.8. Ohio State: 5 by 30.8. Michigan State: 4 by 21.7. Iowa: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 6 by 25. Indiana: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.1 · Games = 6 · -1.0 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · Games = 5 · +1.0 vs Wins
First Half2.4 · Games = 6 · +1.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · Games = 5 · -1.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Indiana | W 28-21 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Wisconsin | L 44-47 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Iowa | W 38-36 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Michigan State | L 13-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Ohio State | W 49-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ IllinoisSplash game | W 46-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Nebraska | W 42-28 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Boston College | W 30-13 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Missouri | L 37-40 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Eastern Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | L 19-20 | 9 | 5 | — | 3.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs NorthwesternSplash game | L 27-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 5.2 | 1.1 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 17 | 38.8 | 14.6 | 17 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 4 | 28.8 | 6.8 | -13 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 72.1 takeover score.
#2
TCU
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#3
Northwestern
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#4
Illinois
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 49.1 takeover score.
#5
Minnesota
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · 5.2 efficiency · 1.1 usage
35.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
27.6
17 primary · 38.8 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
19
4 primary · 28.8 efficiency · 6.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7933
Miami Central · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
94
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.