Player Stats

Chris Bergin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
354
TFL
16.5
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
8
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonNorthwestern71-0--09.1
2017 Regular SeasonNorthwestern71110--09.1
2018 PostseasonNorthwestern10810--034.8
2018 Regular SeasonNorthwestern1038112-034.8
2019 Regular SeasonNorthwestern128660.522066.2
2020 PostseasonNorthwestern99-01-068.3
2020 Regular SeasonNorthwestern96940.514068.3
2021 Regular SeasonNorthwestern121323.50.521064.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Northwestern paired 11.5 primary output with 48.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 47.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Illinois

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Northwestern

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

47.6

Usage

11.7

Consistency

41.7

Best Game by takeover score

Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 1. Indiana State: 1. Duke: 2. Ohio: 0. Nebraska: 0. Rutgers: 1. Michigan: 0. Minnesota: 0. Iowa: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Purdue: 0. Illinois: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 10 by 51.7. Indiana State: 8 by 43.3. Duke: 13 by 70. Ohio: 14 by 50. Nebraska: 8 by 33.3. Rutgers: 9 by 47.5. Michigan: 16 by 50. Minnesota: 16 by 50. Iowa: 10 by 51.7. Wisconsin: 8 by 33.3. Purdue: 5 by 20.8. Illinois: 15 by 70

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 9 · +0 vs Wins