Player Stats

Joshua Paschal College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
137
TFL
35.5
Sacks
13
QB hurries
12
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonKentucky83111-043.1
2017 Regular SeasonKentucky8132.52.52-043.1
2018 Regular SeasonKentucky2310--023
2019 Regular SeasonKentucky12349.53.5-1046.5
2020 PostseasonKentucky1140.50.5--052.6
2020 Regular SeasonKentucky112860.51-052.6
2021 Regular SeasonKentucky12521558-077.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Kentucky paired 28 primary output with 41.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 41.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Kentucky

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

41.4

Usage

13.7

Consistency

69.9

Best Game by takeover score

Vanderbilt

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 3. Missouri: 2. Chattanooga: 4.5. South Carolina: 1. Florida: 2.5. LSU: 1. Georgia: 1. Mississippi State: 2. Tennessee: 0.5. Vanderbilt: 4. New Mexico State: 3.5. Louisville: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 7 by 59.2. Missouri: 2 by 28.3. Chattanooga: 2 by 53.3. South Carolina: 3 by 22.5. Florida: 7 by 54.2. LSU: 3 by 22.5. Georgia: 6 by 35. Mississippi State: 6 by 45. Tennessee: 1 by 9.2. Vanderbilt: 7 by 69.2. New Mexico State: 6 by 60. Louisville: 2 by 38.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.7 · Games = 9 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 3 · -1.6 vs Wins