Player Stats

Isaiah Epps College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
794
Receptions
68
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonKentucky0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonKentucky3455047.5
2018 Regular SeasonKentucky5876041.2
2019 Regular SeasonKentucky0-00-
2020 PostseasonKentucky5323040.8
2020 Regular SeasonKentucky5540040.8
2021 Regular SeasonKentucky511171150.7
2022 Regular SeasonTulsa1237429571.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 429 primary output with 70.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 70.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

35.8

Efficiency

70.9

Usage

16.1

Consistency

62.1

Best Game by takeover score

Ole Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 79. Northern Illinois: 39. Jacksonville State: 37. Ole Miss: 62. Cincinnati: 51. Navy: 37. Temple: 20. SMU: 10. Tulane: 23. Memphis: 23. South Florida: 27. Houston: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 4 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 86.7. Jacksonville State: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 68. Navy: 4 by 61.7. Temple: 2 by 66.7. SMU: 2 by 33.3. Tulane: 2 by 76.7. Memphis: 3 by 51.1. South Florida: 3 by 60. Houston: 3 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28.8 · Games = 5 · -11.9 vs Losses
Losses40.7 · Games = 7 · +11.9 vs Wins