Usage Score
29.1
Player Dossier
2018-2022Penn State
Mac Hippenhammer
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Mac Hippenhammer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.8
Consistency
68.5
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
181920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Penn State • Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mac Hippenhammer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Mac Hippenhammer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 786 primary output with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Miami (OH).
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Miami (OH)
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
59.2
Efficiency
78.8
Usage
29.1
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 43. Kentucky: 85. Unknown: 52. Cincinnati: 62. Northwestern: 20. Buffalo: 90. Kent State: 5. Bowling Green: 14. Western Michigan: 32. Akron: 84. Ohio: 107. Northern Illinois: 105. Ball State: 70
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 100. Kentucky: 7 by 81. Unknown: 4 by 86.7. Cincinnati: 4 by 100. Northwestern: 2 by 66.7. Buffalo: 4 by 100. Kent State: 1 by 33.3. Bowling Green: 2 by 46.7. Western Michigan: 5 by 42.7. Akron: 4 by 100. Ohio: 8 by 89.2. Northern Illinois: 5 by 100. Ball State: 6 by 77.8
Split Comparison
Wins56.8 · n=5 · -5.1 vs Losses
Losses61.9 · n=7 · +5.1 vs Wins
First Half51 · n=7 · -17.7 vs Second Half
Second Half68.7 · n=6 · +17.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ UAB | L 20-24 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Ball State | W 18-17 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ Northern Illinois100 receiving yards | W 29-23 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 47 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-37 | — | 8 | 107 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 3 | 37 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Akron | W 27-9 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 58 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Western Michigan | L 10-16 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Bowling Green | L 13-17 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Kent State | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Buffalo | L 20-24 | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Northwestern | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-38 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Kentucky | L 13-37 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2018-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Miami (OH)
2020-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 103 | 83.3 | 8.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 15 | 100 | 9.1 | -88 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 77 | 100 | 27.8 | 62 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 786 | 88 | 21 | 709 |
| 2022 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 769 | 78.8 | 29.1 | -17 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 769 | 78.8 | 29.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
170
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 89.2 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
786 primary output · 88 efficiency · 21 usage
68.9
#2
2022 Postseason · Miami (OH)
68.3
769 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 29.1 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
68.3
769 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 29.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8653
R Nelson Snider · Fort Wayne, IN
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,750
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.