Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2017-2019Penn State
DE • 6'5" • 264 lbs • Spotsylvania, VA, USA
Yetur Gross-Matos shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.9
Efficiency
37
Consistency
58.1
Season Value
37.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Yetur Gross-Matos, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Penn State. Yetur Gross-Matos shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37 disruption score.
Yetur Gross-Matos played DE for Penn State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Yetur Gross-Matos recorded 111 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Penn State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Penn State paired 28 primary output with 38.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
37
Usage
11.9
Consistency
58.1
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 2. Unknown: 5. Buffalo: 2. Maryland: 2. Purdue: 4. Iowa: 1. Michigan: 0.5. Michigan State: 0.5. Minnesota: 0. Indiana: 2. Ohio State: 5.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 1 by 24.2. Unknown: 3 by 62.5. Buffalo: 3 by 32.5. Maryland: 5 by 40.8. Purdue: 2 by 48.3. Iowa: 5 by 30.8. Michigan: 5 by 25.8. Michigan State: 3 by 17.5. Minnesota: 2 by 8.3. Indiana: 2 by 28.3. Ohio State: 9 by 87.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Memphis | W 53-39 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Ohio State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 17-28 | 9 | 5 | — | 3.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Indiana | W 34-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Minnesota | L 26-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Michigan State | W 28-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Michigan | W 28-21 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Iowa | W 17-12 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Purdue2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ MarylandSplash game | W 59-0 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Buffalo | W 45-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 3 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Penn State | 3.5 | 10.6 | 3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Penn State | 3.5 | 10.6 | 3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Penn State | 28 | 38.1 | 13.8 | 24.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 28 | 38.1 | 13.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Penn State | 24.5 | 37 | 11.9 | -3.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 24.5 | 37 | 11.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 75.8 takeover score.
#2
Ohio State
5.5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 71.3 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
5
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#4
Indiana
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#5
Washington
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Penn State
28 primary output · 38.1 efficiency · 13.8 usage
39.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Penn State
39.6
28 primary · 38.1 efficiency · 13.8 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Penn State
37.9
24.5 primary · 37 efficiency · 11.9 usage
2
Impact games
10
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9223
Chancellor · Fredericksburg, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
111
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.