Player Stats

William Poole College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
27
TFL
1.5
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia51010--015.4
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia23-0--038.8
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia00-0--0-
2021 PostseasonGeorgia750.50-2036.4
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia79-0-2036.4
2022 Regular SeasonGeorgia00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Georgia paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 14.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Georgia

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

14.8

Usage

2

Consistency

14.3

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 2.5. Michigan: 0. Auburn: 0. Missouri: 1. Charleston Southern: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Alabama: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 41.7. Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Missouri: 0 by 10. Charleston Southern: 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Alabama: 5 by 30.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 1 · +0.4 vs Wins