Player Stats

Ameer Speed College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
88
TFL
1
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia35-0-1012.1
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia11-0--036.7
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia45-0--037.8
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia11-0--037
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia713-0--040.3
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan State126310-5042.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Michigan State paired 6 primary output with 26.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia, Michigan State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Akron

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Michigan State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

26.9

Usage

3.4

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Akron

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 0. Akron: 1. Washington: 0. Minnesota: 0. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Michigan: 0. Illinois: 1. Rutgers: 1. Indiana: 2. Penn State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 6 by 25. Akron: 9 by 47.5. Washington: 3 by 12.5. Minnesota: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 12 by 50. Ohio State: 7 by 29.2. Wisconsin: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 12 by 60. Rutgers: 2 by 18.3. Indiana: 0 by 20. Penn State: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 7 · -0.5 vs Wins