Player Stats

D'Andre Swift College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,551
Rushing yards
2,885
Receiving yards
666
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonGeorgia1528217053
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia15743597146453
2018 PostseasonGeorgia14421230171.4
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia141,3041,0372671271.4
2019 PostseasonGeorgia14220080.7
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia141,4321,216216880.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Georgia paired 1,434 primary output with 65.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 65.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Georgia

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

102.4

Efficiency

65.5

Usage

28.5

Consistency

75.8

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 2. Vanderbilt: 147. Murray State: 76. Arkansas State: 140. Notre Dame: 100. Tennessee: 144. South Carolina: 121. Kentucky: 172. Florida: 110. Missouri: 83. Auburn: 103. Texas A&M: 132. Georgia Tech: 73. LSU: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 1 by 20.8. Vanderbilt: 16 by 88.3. Murray State: 7 by 95.2. Arkansas State: 11 by 100. Notre Dame: 21 by 53.9. Tennessee: 21 by 55. South Carolina: 25 by 50.9. Kentucky: 22 by 82.6. Florida: 26 by 39.1. Missouri: 13 by 69.8. Auburn: 19 by 61.6. Texas A&M: 23 by 57.8. Georgia Tech: 10 by 76. LSU: 5 by 66.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins106.8 · Games = 12 · +30.8 vs Losses
Losses76 · Games = 2 · -30.8 vs Wins