Usage Score
2.5
Player Dossier
2018-2020Rutgers
Tim Barrow
DB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Staten Island, NY, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tim Barrow shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
21
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
13.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim Barrow, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Rutgers. Tim Barrow shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Tim Barrow played DB for Rutgers. Across 3 tracked seasons, Tim Barrow recorded 48 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 0 primary output with 7.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
21
Usage
2.5
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 0. Iowa: 1. Boston College: 0. Michigan: 0. Maryland: 0. Indiana: 0. Liberty: 1. Illinois: 1. Ohio State: 1. Michigan State: 2. Penn State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Iowa: 2 by 18.3. Boston College: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Maryland: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 4 by 16.7. Liberty: 1 by 14.2. Illinois: 3 by 22.5. Ohio State: 7 by 39.2. Michigan State: 10 by 61.7. Penn State: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Penn State | L 6-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Michigan State10+ tackles | L 0-27 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Ohio State | L 21-56 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Illinois | L 10-38 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Liberty | W 44-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Indiana | L 0-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Maryland | L 7-48 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Michigan | L 0-52 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Boston College | L 16-30 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Iowa | L 0-30 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Massachusetts | W 48-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | 7.3 | 1.3 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rutgers | 6 | 21 | 2.5 | 6 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -6 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#2
Ohio State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.2 takeover score.
#3
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25 takeover score.
#4
Iowa
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.2 takeover score.
#5
Liberty
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
0 primary output · 7.3 efficiency · 1.3 usage
36.2
#2
2019 Regular Season · Rutgers
13.2
6 primary · 21 efficiency · 2.5 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.85
Tottenville · Staten Island, NY
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
48
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.