Player Stats

Cameron Dollar College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
883
Receptions
60
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonCharlotte329114.5
2019 PostseasonCharlotte12448075
2019 Regular SeasonCharlotte1237551275
2020 Regular SeasonCharlotte410178353.4
2021 Regular SeasonCharlotte5797246.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Charlotte paired 599 primary output with 77.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Marshall

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Charlotte

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

19.4

Efficiency

82.2

Usage

10.2

Consistency

53.7

Best Game by takeover score

Marshall

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 19. Middle Tennessee: 0. Louisiana Tech: 28. Marshall: 50. Old Dominion: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 2 by 63.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 83.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins9.5 · Games = 2 · -16.5 vs Losses
Losses26 · Games = 3 · +16.5 vs Wins