Player Stats

Aaren Vaughns College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
736
Receptions
47
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonUtah State0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonUtah State0-00-
2017 PostseasonUtah State9437044.2
2017 Regular SeasonUtah State910118244.2
2018 PostseasonUtah State132109269.7
2018 Regular SeasonUtah State1331472369.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Utah State paired 581 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boise State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Utah State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

44.7

Efficiency

82.2

Usage

11.4

Consistency

58.4

Best Game by takeover score

Boise State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 109. Michigan State: 37. New Mexico State: 37. Tennessee Tech: 2. Air Force: 44. BYU: 21. UNLV: 43. Wyoming: 14. New Mexico: 63. Hawai'i: 24. San José State: 31. Colorado State: 49. Boise State: 107

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 2 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 82.2. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Tennessee Tech: 1 by 13.3. Air Force: 2 by 100. BYU: 3 by 46.7. UNLV: 2 by 100. Wyoming: 2 by 46.7. New Mexico: 3 by 100. Hawai'i: 2 by 80. San José State: 2 by 100. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Boise State: 7 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins39.7 · Games = 11 · -32.3 vs Losses
Losses72 · Games = 2 · +32.3 vs Wins