Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2017-2021Baylor
Trestan Ebner
RB • 5'11" • 208 lbs • Henderson, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Trestan Ebner leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
54.9
Consistency
60.1
Season Value
59.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Baylor
1718181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trestan Ebner, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Baylor. Trestan Ebner leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.9 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Baylor paired 1,083 primary output with 54.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 195 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Baylor
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
77.4
Efficiency
54.9
Usage
21.5
Consistency
60.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 36. Texas State: 114. Unknown: 195. Kansas: 72. Iowa State: 44. Oklahoma State: 0. West Virginia: 53. BYU: 102. Texas: 66. TCU: 39. Oklahoma: 69. Kansas State: 93. Texas Tech: 156. Oklahoma State: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 6 by 62.5. Texas State: 21 by 60.1. Unknown: 14 by 100. Kansas: 12 by 62.5. Iowa State: 10 by 42.6. Oklahoma State: 8 by 0. West Virginia: 10 by 63.5. BYU: 12 by 85.4. Texas: 12 by 57.3. TCU: 12 by 33.9. Oklahoma: 17 by 36.6. Kansas State: 18 by 59. Texas Tech: 16 by 60.4. Oklahoma State: 8 by 44.2
Split Comparison
Wins77.2 · n=11 · +57.7 vs Losses
Losses19.5 · n=2 · -57.7 vs Wins
First Half73.4 · n=7 · -7.9 vs Second Half
Second Half81.3 · n=7 · +7.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/2 | @ Ole Miss | W 21-7 | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Oklahoma State | W 21-16 | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 5.5 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Texas Tech150 scrimmage yards | W 27-24 | 12 | 38 | 3.20 | 0 | 4 | 118 | 9.8 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Kansas State | W 20-10 | 11 | 66 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 5.2 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Oklahoma | W 27-14 | 13 | 41 | 3.20 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ TCU | L 28-30 | 12 | 39 | 3.30 | 1 | — | — | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Texas | W 31-24 | 12 | 66 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs BYU | W 38-24 | 11 | 95 | 8.60 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8.5 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs West Virginia | W 45-20 | 8 | 53 | 6.60 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Iowa State | W 31-29 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Kansas | W 45-7 | 12 | 72 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | — | 10 | 125 | 12.50 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 13.9 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Texas State100 rush yards | W 29-20 | 20 | 120 | 6 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 5.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Baylor
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Baylor | 388 | 52.5 | 8.4 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Baylor | 759 | 65.2 | 11.7 | 371 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Baylor | 759 | 65.2 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Baylor | 572 | 51.5 | 10.7 | -187 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Baylor | 572 | 51.5 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Baylor | 406 | 32.8 | 15.5 | -166 |
| 2021 Postseason | Baylor | 1,083 | 54.9 | 21.5 | 677 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Baylor | 1,083 | 54.9 | 21.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 195 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
195
Primary metric
195 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#2
Vanderbilt
199
Primary metric
Win with 199 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
199 scrimmage yards and 23.5 usage.
#3
West Virginia
163
Primary metric
Loss with 163 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
163 scrimmage yards and 12.1 usage.
#4
Kansas
95
Primary metric
Win with 95 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
95 scrimmage yards and 15.4 usage.
#5
UTSA
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 7.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Baylor
1,083 primary output · 54.9 efficiency · 21.5 usage
59.1
#2
2021 Regular Season · Baylor
59.1
1,083 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Baylor
48.5
759 primary · 65.2 efficiency · 11.7 usage
Milestones
8
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8772
Henderson · Henderson, TX
- Committed To
- Baylor
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,208
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 58 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.