Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Baylor paired 29 primary output with 53.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Baylor | 10 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 31.9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Baylor | 10 | 44 | 3 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 31.9 |
| 2019 Postseason | Baylor | 14 | 5 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 62.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Baylor | 14 | 107 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.4 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Baylor | 5 | 55 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 68.7 |
| 2021 Postseason | Baylor | 13 | 17 | 2 | 2 | - | 1 | 0 | 78.4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Baylor | 13 | 86 | 10.5 | 5.5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 78.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Baylor paired 29 primary output with 53.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 53.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
53.7
Usage
14.1
Consistency
60
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 5. Texas State: 4.5. Texas Southern: 0. Kansas: 1. Iowa State: 0. West Virginia: 2. BYU: 2. Texas: 3.5. TCU: 2. Oklahoma: 4. Kansas State: 1. Texas Tech: 3. Oklahoma State: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 17 by 100. Texas State: 9 by 82.5. Texas Southern: 7 by 29.2. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. West Virginia: 9 by 57.5. BYU: 5 by 40.8. Texas: 7 by 64.2. TCU: 11 by 65.8. Oklahoma: 9 by 77.5. Kansas State: 6 by 35. Texas Tech: 8 by 63.3. Oklahoma State: 10 by 51.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.