Player Stats

Mike Glass III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
4,920
Passing yards
4,098
Rushing yards
822
Touchdowns
46

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00000-
2017 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00000-
2018 PostseasonEastern Michigan822520421356.5
2018 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan81,1968203761256.5
2019 PostseasonEastern Michigan1139431183381.4
2019 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan113,1052,7633422881.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Eastern Michigan paired 3,499 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 65.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh

Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Eastern Michigan

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

318.1

Efficiency

65.9

Usage

32.6

Consistency

87

Best Game by takeover score

Pittsburgh

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 394. Coastal Carolina: 199. Kentucky: 372. Illinois: 353. Central Connecticut: 295. Central Michigan: 220. Ball State: 319. Toledo: 329. Akron: 329. Northern Illinois: 266. Kent State: 423

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 71 by 59.8. Coastal Carolina: 29 by 69.5. Kentucky: 63 by 59.3. Illinois: 46 by 68.5. Central Connecticut: 49 by 55.4. Central Michigan: 44 by 52.7. Ball State: 47 by 55.1. Toledo: 49 by 64.3. Akron: 33 by 90.5. Northern Illinois: 30 by 79.1. Kent State: 46 by 71.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins288.4 · Games = 5 · -54.4 vs Losses
Losses342.8 · Games = 6 · +54.4 vs Wins